Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Aug 1998 10:00:37 -0700 (PDT) | From | "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <> | Subject | Re: NFS looking good! |
| |
On Wed, 26 Aug 1998, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Most ranges are netmasks however. *.foocom.com is normally actually also > > > 204.111.139.* as well > > I take differance with this I have and use CIDR just about > > every where . > > How will we do 204.111.139.128/25 ? And any of its kin ? > > I was just simplifying the point. Obviously the kernel can compute > a netmask just fine I thought the context was NFS, not the kernel , Sorry to be off topic. Then for a suggestion when will nfs/knfs be able to utilizing the above Sub-netting technique ?
Tia, JimL +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | James W. Laferriere - Network Engineer - babydr@nwrain.net | | System Techniques - 25416 - 22nd S. - Des-Moines, WA 98198 | | Give me VMS -or- Give me Linux -but- only on AXP | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ |-> Linux-Vax Port, Now in Progress !YAY! there's Progress To Report <-| |-> Please See http://ucnet.canberra.edu.au/~mikal/vaxlinux/home.html <-| |-> Maintainer: Michael Still mikal@blitzen.canberra.edu.au <-| +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |