lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: kill -9 <pid of X>
From
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Jon M. Taylor wrote:
> On 12 Aug 1998, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So "that's not the kernel's job" is correct.
>
> I stand by my claim. If userspace cannot, by its nature, properly
> guarantee the atomicity of those critical sections, video card programming
> cannot be done properly in userspace. Thus, it *is* the kernel's job.

Remember, we're talking about defending against signals from a hostile
root who wants to crash the video card. In this scenario, not even the
kernel can do it -- root can install a kernel module which overwrites
the CLI instruction in the "atomic" code with a NOP. It's a little
more work than "killall -9 XF86_SVGA".

> Sorry> trusting the X server, you convinced me of that. I will NOT buy the X
> server being unable to handle signal 9 correctly.

Boy, it's no wonder Linus is grumpy these days.

Kragen


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.156 / U:0.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site