lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: kill -9 <pid of X>
Date
From

In message <Pine.LNX.3.96.980812092024.865A-100000@einstein.london.sco.com>, Ti
gran Aivazian wrote:
} On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
} > It' s not a kernel issue. If the X server run in iopl() and own the video
} > card, _it_ must care that everything will return OK when it' s killed.
} When one is killed one cannot care even if one had such intentions while
} being alive.
Oh come on. If it's killed with anything other than signal 9, it can
clean up before exiting.

} > It' s possible using a X wrapper that run as root (not as user) and wait
} > for the child to die (once the X child is died the wrapper can restore the
} > text console fine).
} Well, what if you kill -9 the wrapper too?
If you kill -9 the wrapper, you get what you deserve. What if you pour
water over the motherboard while the machine is running? Should the kernel
attempt to guard against that as well?

--
Jon Hamilton
hamilton@pobox.com


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans