Messages in this thread | | | From | (Alan Cox) | Subject | Re: kill -9 <pid of X> | Date | Wed, 12 Aug 1998 16:41:36 +0100 (BST) |
| |
> Massive re-coding? Sounds like X just has to be protected from signal 9 > just like init. That means you just need something to make X unique > to the kernel's signal "generator". Remember, you did not kill X, you > told the kernel to do it --- and it did.
Or the kernel decided to blow it away, or I fed it stuff that crashed it solidly. There are many ways to upset the Xserver. (Thats not entirely an argument against any specific setup btw - no doubt kernel code would have some upset potential too)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |