lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: FS Corruption in 2.1.109 (fwd)
Date
> Oh, I mean: "Oh his machine".

Ok

> that 2.1.x defaulted to having CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA set to 'y', but in
> 2.0.x we have CONFIG_BLK_DEV_TRITON instead (again defaulting to 'y'), but
> when the name changed maybe something else changed too?

Its less generic - but most people have triton chipsets if they have DMA

> While the newer code seems to enable DMA whenever the drive reports
> supporting it.

Drive/chipset pair (obviously enough). But yes.

> Note that it could easily be some other timing thing that triggers it.
> Which is definitely supported by the thing that it seems to have appeared
> at least for one person between 2.1.101 and 2.1.103 even though there are
> no real changes wrt either disk driver or filesystem in those patches as
> far as I can see.

See the other message I sent when I did a summary of non SMP by drive type.
For the uniprocessor case once I did that it was obviously drive firmware.

So for the non SMP case I think its solved and Linus can have a small gold
star. SMP alone has no obvious pattern at all (except SMP 8( )

Alan


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans