lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Kernel v2.3.x
From
Date
>>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Schwab <schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de> writes:

Andreas> Alex Buell <alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk> writes:
|> I've been thinking about the 2.3.x development, I have some suggestions
|> that might help make the code tree more manageable.
|>
|> How about splitting the kernel tree into separate .tar.gz files like so:
|>
|> 1) Linux-Core-2.3.x.tar.gz - contains the 100% portable core of kernel
|> 2) Linux-Arch-<cpu>-2.3.x.tar.gz - contains the architecture specifics
|> i.e Linux-Arch-ia32-2.3.x,
|> Linux-Arch-ia64-2.3.x,
|> Linux-Arch-mips-2.3.x ... and so forth.
|> 3) Linux-Drivers-<cpu>-2.3.x - contains the drivers for that architecture
|> ie. Linux-Drivers-ia32... you get the idea.

Andreas> There are already drivers that compile for multiple
Andreas> architectures. Where would you put them? Surely you don't
Andreas> want to keep separate copies for each of the supported
Andreas> architecture.

Yes and I can't wait for the maintenance nightmare this is going to
cause for the port maintainers - can we please forget this idea about
splitting the source once and for all.

Jes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:6.130 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site