Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 19 Jul 1998 10:35:44 +0200 (MET DST) | From | "Michael L. Galbraith" <> | Subject | Re: patch-ikd+profile+stack-meter against 109 |
| |
On Sat, 18 Jul 1998, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jul 1998, Michael L. Galbraith wrote: > > >Do you think something like glimpse indexing a small (3.6g) array would > >be better? One BIG process doing massive fs job. > > I think yes. Please also upgrade to my latest idk patch (-3) since I was > accounting the stack only for process with pid != 0 but I can' t see any > good reason to not account also the stack for the pid 0 (an so for the > interrupts that happens while idle was running). The same should be true > for KSTACK_MAGIC. > > Andrea[s] Arcangeli
OK, done. Identical results.
-Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |