lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Strange interrupt behaviour
Date
> The problem is smp_processor_id(). It is one of the first functions
> evaluated in the interrupt entry code, and it is - surprise, surprise -
> defined as (current->processor). I have not checked whether there are
> other interactions like this in e.g. the spinlock code too.

So you need a fake "current" on the end of the irq pages for each CPU -ok

Alan




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.183 / U:0.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site