Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Jul 1998 13:33:02 +0200 | From | Brian Schau <> | Subject | Re: PPP in 2.1.107? |
| |
David Ford wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Jul 1998, Brian Schau wrote: > > should I downgrade to 2.3.0 or upgrade >2.3.3? > > upgrade as is suggested in the documentation. > > -d > -- > Please read the linux/Documentation/ files and review the last week of mail > on linux-kernel before posting your problem. > PLEASE don't quote _many_ lines and type _few_ lines > -thx
Yes - I have RTFM. It states that I should upgrade to 2.3.5. No problem.
Apparently, I didn't make myself clear. Does the combination:
2.1.107+isdn+ppp
work flawlessly when having an endpoint which is configured like:
2.0.33+isdn+ppp
? I'd like to hear from people having experiences with these kind of connections.
The problem is, that I'm getting a lot of 'funny' messages in the log on both the endpoint-machine (2.0.33+isdn+ppp (ipppd)) and my own machine when I connect:
... select: Bad file number. ... couldn't restore device fd flags: Bad file numbers.
(I don't get these on a 2.0.34 box. 'ipppd' is the one to be obtained from ftp.think.de ...)
My guess is that it's the ipppd which is poorly coded?
Occasionally, my logs are filled with:
Kernel: Socket destroy delayed (r=0 w=144) # w is sometimes 128
... these are not just repeated 2 or 3 times as David Miller once said:
last message repeated 9 times. last message repeated 10 times.
... and so on.
I will try to upgrade my homepc and my endpoint to the latest and greatest ppp-2.3.whatever and see if it helps ...
Best regards,
Brian
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |