Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Jul 1998 11:44:57 -0400 (EDT) | From | Tom Vier <> | Subject | Re: 108 compile problems for alpha |
| |
> > I'm not sure why RH went with egcs in 5.1 when Linus has stated publically > > that there are problems with egcs. If gcc-2.8.1 was stable, why not stick > > with it? Oh well... > > Uh, Red Hat 5.1 does not default to egcs. The default compiler is gcc > 2.7.2.3. Slackware 3.5 made the mistake of using egcs by default.
that's partly try, for redhat 5.0, anyway. dunno about 5.1, but under 5.0, root doesn't have /usr/loca/bin in it's path and gcc 2.7.x is /usr/bin/gcc, while egcs is /usr/local/bin/gcc.
-- Tom Vier - 0x82B007A8 | Hate Micro$hit, AOLame, and Untel? thomassr@erols.com | Then goto the Zero Page at: Tortured Souls Software | http://www.erols.com/thomassr/zero/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |