lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: poor change in ncr53c8xx/linux-2.1.104
Date
"A month of sundays ago Gerard Roudier wrote:"
>
>
> On the other hand, it seems that the mdelay() function is not defined in
> 2.0 kernels. Given the time needed to have a new stable kernel, drivers

Good point.

> have to be often updated in stable and so must be source compatible with
> stable kernels.

Put #ifndef HAVE_MDELAY #define mdelay(x) something #endif in the driver
code, and put #define HAVE_MDELAY in the new 2.1.* header where mdelay is
prototyped?

It seems we are going towards autoconfig ...

> Gerard.

Peter ptb@it.uc3m.es



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.041 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site