lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: setsockopt(RCVBUF) Invalid argument with 2.1.103
Date
> > Until Linus wakes up and allows a per user resource management
> > facility and includes committed physical memory in it (which btw
> > cleans up mlock and fixes the PTE problems) its not possible. In
> > fact for 2.1.x even the existing defaults are unsafe and broken. It
> > isnt however a networking problem really its a resource problem.
>
>
> Do you have a design and/or a patch?

Design yes, although sct is now picking holes in it on irc (he has the
advantage of having hacked on VMS which did this bit right for a long time)
anbd has also pointed out it solves the RTNONBLOCK issues with real time
signal queue sizes locked pages and the like.

Alan


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:1.467 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site