Messages in this thread | | | From | (Alan Cox) | Subject | Re: setsockopt(RCVBUF) Invalid argument with 2.1.103 | Date | Wed, 3 Jun 1998 23:28:48 +0100 (BST) |
| |
> > Until Linus wakes up and allows a per user resource management > > facility and includes committed physical memory in it (which btw > > cleans up mlock and fixes the PTE problems) its not possible. In > > fact for 2.1.x even the existing defaults are unsafe and broken. It > > isnt however a networking problem really its a resource problem. > > > Do you have a design and/or a patch?
Design yes, although sct is now picking holes in it on irc (he has the advantage of having hacked on VMS which did this bit right for a long time) anbd has also pointed out it solves the RTNONBLOCK issues with real time signal queue sizes locked pages and the like.
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |