Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 Jun 1998 08:39:14 -0500 (CDT) | From | Andrew Kieschnick <> | Subject | Re: Weird spelling fixes in 2.1.107 |
| |
On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, Terry L Ridder wrote:
> Having been "blasted" this evening by several clients, who feel > that the wholesale spell and grammar changes were capricious and > wondering why we are more concerned with spelling and grammar then > ensuring that nothing to broken by those fixes. If the only way I can > salvage the clients and their use of Linux is by backing out the > spelling and grammar fixes that is exactly what I am going to do.
Uhm, these are development kernels we're talking about - they don't necessarily work right (or even compile or boot in a couple of cases). Things sometimes get broken in one version and fixed in the next. Your clients should either know and expect that, or they should be using a 2.0.xx kernel. I mean, if some spelling changes send them off the deep end, just imagine what would have happened if they'd run 2.1.44.
later, Andrew Kieschnick
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |