Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Thread implementations... | From | Andi Kleen <> | Date | 22 Jun 1998 13:57:20 +0200 |
| |
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) writes:
> > One _byte_? Would not one long be much, much better? How are you going > > to fit filehandle into one byte? > > I think its one byte, and I agree one long might be better, one byte is > a good enough hash into a pending I/O RQ table
At least in my 2.1.106 includes sigval_t for i386 is defined as:
typedef union sigval { int sival_int; void *sival_ptr; } sigval_t;
The Single Unix speciification defines it as:
... The sigval union is defined as: int sival_int integer signal value void* sival_ptr pointer signal value
-Andi
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |