Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 3 Jun 1998 03:01:48 +0200 (CEST) | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: Processes stuck in 'D' state in 2.0.33 and 2.0.34preX |
| |
On Wed, 20 May 1998 apataki@viconet.com wrote:
>Trace: 12a315 <wait_on_super+15/40> >Trace: 15f550 <ext2_alloc_block+20/1b0> >Trace: 15fcb4 <block_getblk+174/2a0> >Trace: 15ff47 <ext2_getblk+167/240> >Trace: 15e099 <ext2_file_write+1b9/4a0> >Trace: 1aacdf <vsprintf+48f/4d0> >Trace: 1aacdf <vsprintf+48f/4d0> >Trace: 10a94a <signal_return+12/38> >Trace: 10a94a <signal_return+12/38> >Trace: 4800000 >Trace: 4800000 >Trace: 134f12 <write_dquot+f2/150> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >Trace: 135809 <dqput+a9/e0> ^^^^^^^^^^^ >Trace: 135ef1 <dquot_drop+21/40> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >Trace: 125a68 <clear_inode+68/160> >Trace: 15ece0 <ext2_free_inode+230/250> >Trace: 15eced <ext2_free_inode+23d/250> >Trace: 15f4f1 <ext2_put_inode+61/70> >Trace: 126129 <iput+d9/1c0> >Trace: 124daa <__fput+3a/40> >Trace: 124e08 <close_fp+58/70> >Trace: 117e54 <do_exit+124/200> >Trace: 10a75b <do_signal+24b/2ac> >Trace: 10a94a <signal_return+12/38>
Are the underlined lines significative even if there is "Trace: 4800000" in the middle of the trace?
If so you could try this patch but before try it be sure to backup _all_ your data!!!!!! I have not tried nor compiled it and I have not idea of what of bad could happen (hd in fire?!?). It' s against 2.0.33.
Andrea[s] Arcangeli
--- linux-2.0.33/fs/dquot.c 1998/06/03 00:47:58 1.1 +++ linux-2.0.33/fs/dquot.c 1998/06/03 00:59:13 @@ -472,10 +472,8 @@ dquot->dq_count--; return; } - wake_up(&dquot_wait); if (dquot->dq_flags & DQ_MOD) { write_dquot(dquot); /* we can sleep - so do again */ - wait_on_dquot(dquot); goto repeat; } }
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |