lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [IDEA] Developers: your opinion badly needed ! (Was: [PATCH] /proc/config.gz)
On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Marty Leisner wrote:

> Having a /proc/config is a good idea.
>
> Having to match static files with a running kernel is a bad
> idea...no matter how careful you are, you may make mistakes (assuming
> you can find the file).
>
> The solution for /boot/*-${VERSION} is not sufficient when
> multiple kernels exists for the same version...

Why not? You can't come up with descriptive uniqe names?

/kernels/System.map-2.0.33-1-stackln
/kernels/System.map-2.0.33-stackF
/kernels/System.map-2.0.33-stackln
/kernels/config-2.0.33-1-stackln
/kernels/config-2.0.33-stackF
/kernels/config-2.0.33-stackln
/kernels/vmlinuz-2.0.33-1-stackln
/kernels/vmlinuz-2.0.33-stackF
/kernels/vmlinuz-2.0.33-stackln

The only problem I'll have is remembering exactly how these differ a year
from now...but /proc/config isn't going to help with that. Wasn't there a
/proc/patches patch that lists all the patches used if they register with
it? That might be far more useful.

> When you need this information, you want ACCURATE infomation, not a guess
> (multiple files are a guess).

But this really isn't a kernel issue...it's an administration issue. If
/proc/config goes in, at least make it optional.


------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Spammers will be winnuked or
Network Administrator | drawn and quartered...whichever
Florida Digital Turnpike | is more convenient.
______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key____


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.058 / U:0.868 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site