lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: bonnie comparisons of 2.0.34 and 2.1.105
On Sun, 14 Jun 1998, Samuli Kaski wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Andrew J. Anderson wrote:
>
> > I thought the list would be interested in this comparison of bonnie results:

[snip 100% perf incr.]

> I think there is more to it. I get decreasing (avg ~1-20%) bonnie
> performance with 2.1.105 compaired to 2.0.3x but still 2.1.105 is
> lightyears :) faster than 2.0 just in about anything - even the bare eye
> can see it.

Keyword: mmap() readahead. Kudos to the guys who did it...

New for 2.3: swapin readahead for a similar improvement of
swapping code :)

Rik.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Linux memory management tour guide. H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl |
| Scouting Vries cubscout leader. http://www.phys.uu.nl/~riel/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.304 / U:0.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site