Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 14 Jun 1998 07:19:09 +0200 (MET DST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: bonnie comparisons of 2.0.34 and 2.1.105 |
| |
On Sun, 14 Jun 1998, Samuli Kaski wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Andrew J. Anderson wrote: > > > I thought the list would be interested in this comparison of bonnie results:
[snip 100% perf incr.]
> I think there is more to it. I get decreasing (avg ~1-20%) bonnie > performance with 2.1.105 compaired to 2.0.3x but still 2.1.105 is > lightyears :) faster than 2.0 just in about anything - even the bare eye > can see it.
Keyword: mmap() readahead. Kudos to the guys who did it...
New for 2.3: swapin readahead for a similar improvement of swapping code :)
Rik. +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Linux memory management tour guide. H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl | | Scouting Vries cubscout leader. http://www.phys.uu.nl/~riel/ | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |