lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: OFFTOPIC: e2fsprogs and +2Gb partitions
    Date
    > old place.  You simply cannot compare the total ommission of the
    > llseek prototype with the. The glibc API is intended to be different
    > from the libc5 API. The changes are not made because some standards
    > demands them but instead because the libc5 made it wrong and we
    > haven't made this error while developing glibc in parallel. It
    > becomes time to remove all the #ifdef __linux__ from the sources and
    > use the code which all platforms can use.

    As anyone who lives in the commercial world will tell you, breaking
    compatibility is frequently a bigger mistake than trying to ignore past
    mistakes. You are without a doubt right that -D_POSIX_SOURCE et al should
    not include llseek. You are without a doubt wrong to have not included
    as close to full libc5 compatibility for -D_LINUX_SOURCE.

    The glibc folks seem so intent on standards they've forgotten people have
    to use the stuff perhaps.

    Alan


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.020 / U:30.952 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site