Messages in this thread | | | From | Paul Kimoto <> | Date | Mon, 18 May 1998 21:19:17 -0400 | Subject | Re: fork() failures in 2.1.101 |
| |
On Mon, May 18, 1998 at 10:10:22PM +0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > YES. The fragmentation part is very very very useful. >> Mem-info: >> Free pages: 844kB >> ( 1*4kB 3*8kB 5*16kB 21*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB = 844kB) > Hmm. At the time you took these stats, were the > trouble over? (most likely they were)
No.
I still can't run non-trivial pipelines (e.g., "man proc" fails trying to run tbl|groff|less), and at the moment the memory information looks like this:
> Mem-info: > Free pages: 14136kB > ( 528*4kB 873*8kB 227*16kB 42*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB = 14136kB) > Swap cache: add 22934/22934, delete 22747/22747, find 0/0 > Free swap: 122576kB > 12288 pages of RAM > 524 reserved pages > 2192 pages shared > 187 pages swap cached > Buffer memory: 1856kB > Buffer heads: 1873 > Buffer blocks: 1856 > CLEAN: 1425 buffers, 6 used (last=6), 0 locked, 0 protected, 0 dirty > LOCKED: 377 buffers, 78 used (last=290), 0 locked, 0 protected, 0 dirty
-Paul <kimoto@lightlink.com>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |