[lkml]   [1998]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: GGI ;o) (Was: Re: Boot Logo Thoughts (LONG))
    On Sun, 17 May 1998, Richard Gooch wrote:

    > Mike A. Harris writes:
    > > On Sat, 16 May 1998, Richard Gooch wrote:
    > >
    > > > > > On another note, why do we build gzip into kernel images when something
    > > > > > like bzip2 has come along?
    > > > >
    > > > > Oh, no!!! Not *this* flame-war again! Do we have to touch *every* old
    > > > > stomping-ground this week?
    > > >
    > > > Looks like it :-( I'm surprised we haven't seen GGI start up again.
    > >
    > > Why? Whats wrong with GGI?????!?!?!!!?!?! ;o)
    > >
    > > I just downloaded the latest GGI snapshot, and it is cool! ;o)
    > I have no problem with GGI. My problem is with people who start long
    > threads (which degenerate into flamewars) about GGI. The GGI team has
    > said they're not ready yet to submit their code to Linus, yet every
    > time the GGI thread starts up again people whine about "pretty please,
    > let's have GGI in the kernel *NOW*, it's the best thing since sliced
    > bread, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera".

    Part of the reason for this is that graphics is a subject that
    tends to appeal to a much broader audience than, say, SCSI drivers. This
    means that more of our supporters will tend to be those that are
    interested in Linux but are maybe less technically sophisticated about
    kernel development issues.

    > Once the GGI team submit their code, serious discussion about the pros
    > and cons can begin. Before that leave them in peace to deliver the
    > goods. Premature activism on "behalf" of GGI is in fact detrimental,
    > as it can entrench opposition to it.

    As has happened in the past. We are trying to ensure that this
    does not happen again, hence my posting.

    > Some of this opposition is due to
    > some of the major players in Linux having been unimpressed by an older
    > version of GGI, and some is due to the excessive proselytising of the
    > GGI cause.

    Again, we realize this and are taking steps to repair the
    situation. I am going to be trying to put a lid on the flaming in
    linux-kernel, and others are working on integrating KGI with the various
    fbdev-related projects that have been floating around lately. With luck,
    all of this mess may get sorted out to everyone's satisfaction in 2.3.


    'Cloning and the reprogramming of DNA is the first serious step in
    becoming one with God.'
    - Scientist G. Richard Seed

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.020 / U:11.144 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site