Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 28 Mar 1998 05:34:56 +0100 (MET) | From | "Michael L. Galbraith" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] APM support doesn't compile with binutils 2.8.1.0.24 |
| |
On Fri, 27 Mar 1998, Harald Koenig wrote:
> On Mar 25, MOLNAR Ingo wrote: > > > the testcode has to be run as root, it should produce something like this: > > > > [root@hell asm]# ./test2 > > best pushw latency: 19 cycles > > best pushl latency: 20 cycles > > with a [true;] Pentium OverDrive PODP-83 I got > > best pushw latency: 30 cycles > best pushl latency: 19 cycles > > > remember that this weird CPU was the reason why I started that bogomips thread > about alignment of the delay loop and (not) inlining it. > looks like this is yet another example of weird differences between > read Pentium and Pentium OverDrive... >
MMX-Overdrive says..
best pushw latency: 20 cycles best pushl latency: 20 cycles
-Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |