Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 25 Apr 1998 17:03:38 +0200 (CEST) | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: lp.c in 2.0.x |
| |
On Sat, 25 Apr 1998, Wolfgang Walter wrote:
>> It force lp to don' t care about the interrupt so it' s the same of >> working in polling, take a look at /proc/interrupt and you will see. > >Not really, as I use tunelp to switch interrupt on. And /proc/interrupts >show that the interrupt is installed and works.
Excuse me, I should look _all_ your patch ;-).
Basically your patch request the printer irq a lot before starting to print. It doesn' t change how the lp handle the interrupt. This make no sense to me. Also if this is true it means that in the parport code we can' t request_irq/free_irq during the printing and so a lot of parport code should be rewritten to handle that. I think also my fix can' t help you. It would be nice if you could try the plain 2.1.98 lp and feedback.
Andrea[s] Arcangeli
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |