lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Lots of SCSI-disks, how?!
On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Richard Gooch wrote:

> David Woodhouse writes:
> >
> > Richard.Gooch@atnf.CSIRO.AU said:
> > > 16 SCSI discs is the limit because the Linux SCSI implementation
> > > supports 16 partitions per disc. With 8 bit minor numbers, you can
> > > only fit 16*16 (256) partitions and discs on a SCSI system.
> >
> > > One "solution" is to increase the minor number size, but that has
> > > problems with C library compatibilities.
> >
> > I thought glibc supported 64 bit dev_t. The filesystems might have problems,
> > though.
>
> There's still plently of people using libc 5 (and for good
> reasons!). I think there's even people using libc 4. If 2.3 were to
> introduce a 64 bit dev_t, it would stuff these people up, I think.
> While you could perhaps argue that libc 4 is so ancient that it
> doesn't have to be supported with kernel 2.3, I don't think libc 5
> compatibility should be broken yet.

Hey, I'm so cheap that I still have xv 3.00 (because it was the last
freeware version) and it was compiled against libc 4. Actually I've got
a fair amount of stuff that is still a.out and I've never found the
time to hunt down sources and rebuild it. Should I be clearing my
calendar for this task?
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mwood@IUPUI.Edu
I'd rather be designing and coding.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.073 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site