lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 2.1.97] more capabilities support

Andrej Presern writes:
> > I'm happy to say that capabilities as a concept have emerged from this
> > research. It is my understanding that they are preferable to many of
> > the other alternatives because they can be implemented in such a way
> > that does not slow down the kernel.
>
> You don't know how right you are:) Only that I'm not talking about
> capability lists such as POSIX:)

I think you will find that POSIX labels your flavor of capability as
"Mandatory Access Control" it is also a part of the POSIX draft...

Cheers

Andrew



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.055 / U:0.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site