Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Apr 1998 12:11:48 -0400 (EDT) | From | Jeff Morriss <> | Subject | Re: Per process mount options? |
| |
I hate to respond to my own mail, but I'd also hate to allow this pre-first-cup-of-coffee ignorance remain out there... Please ignore my previous posting... I don't know what I was thinking.
Humbly, -J
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > > > Morning guys, > > > > I don't remember if this has been discussed before, but what about per > > process mount options? > > > > I just watched our backup system blaze over the fs and thought how nice it > > would be if I could enable no_atime for tar, so it really would just read > > instead of consuming huge resources because it has to update no_atime for > > gazillion files. > > > milliways [~/]> tar --help | grep atime > --atime-preserve don't change access times on dumped files > > > That is, BTW, GNU tar... Of course, if you want to use something besides > 'tar', that's a different story. > > Hope this helps, > -J
-- Robert "Jeff"rey Morriss CS Grad Student; CS Labbie morriss@pobox.com SUNY Buffalo (Buffalo, NY; USA) http://www.pobox.com/~morriss #include<std/disclaimer.h> PGP key on public key servers; Linux: the choice of a GNU generation
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |