Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Apr 1998 16:57:25 +1000 (EST) | From | Paul Wilkins <> | Subject | Re: Microsoft slime |
| |
On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, David Schwartz wrote:
> >For the LA Times today: > > > >"The elaborate plan, outlined in confidential documents obtained by The > >Times, hinges on a number of unusual-and some say unethical-tactics, > > > Presumably they will be at least as unethical as stealing confidential > documents.
I would think leaking documents _was_ ethical, as long as it meets the test of "in the public interest". I would say that exposing an attempt to hoodwink the public meets that test.
Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
,--- Paul Wilkins | o o | Internet Operations Manager ` \_/ ' Linux TMP Worldwide /\___/\ The Choice of paulw@tmpw.com.au |_/ . \_| A GNU Generation http://www.monsterboard.com.au \_/___\_/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |