Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Apr 1998 16:47:50 +0100 (IST) | From | Kent Brockman <> | Subject | Re: T/TCP: Syn and RST Cookies |
| |
au contraire, for my final year project I have to implement T/TCP for linux, its almost done (not perfect) and I'll be making a patch available within the next week or two. Unfortunately it's only for the 2.0.32 kernel (the 2.1.x weren't stable enough), but with minor modifications, it should work with 2.0.33 and 2.0.34 when available.
I know the current spec for T/TCP has a lot of opposition, but for research purposes, are there any more problems with it, besides SYN flood attacks and rlogin authentication problems?
Mark Stacey ... and that's my two cents. "Its not that I forgot, its just that I can't remember"
On Sun, 12 Apr 1998, David S. Miller wrote:
> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1998 18:16:19 -0700 > From: Jim Dennis <jimd@starshine.org> > > Is T/TCP (RFC1644) implemented in the Linux kernel? > > No, and until it is at least a real RFC standard, it won't be. >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |