[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: GGI Project Unhappy On Linux
    Alan Cox wrote:
    > > KGI isn't going away because there are no other proposals to
    > > deal with the problem that Xservers crash systems.
    > Not quite the case
    > fbcon already handles this on the PPC, 68K and soon the ARM platform
    > the sparc code handles this on the sparc (and needs moving to fbcon)
    > Its just these funny intel boxes that need moving to some kind of fbcon/kgi
    > combo. fbcon does all the framebuffer, kgi has the loadable pc
    > style drivers and some work on acceleration that is going to go somewhere
    > good whatever shape it ends up in. The combination of the lot once figured
    > will be real nice for everyone
    > Alan

    Can best parts of KGI and fbcon be merged? How much work would that
    propose to both sides?


    Andrej Presern,

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.026 / U:1.780 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site