[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: GGI Project Unhappy On Linux
Alan Cox wrote:
> > KGI isn't going away because there are no other proposals to
> > deal with the problem that Xservers crash systems.
> Not quite the case
> fbcon already handles this on the PPC, 68K and soon the ARM platform
> the sparc code handles this on the sparc (and needs moving to fbcon)
> Its just these funny intel boxes that need moving to some kind of fbcon/kgi
> combo. fbcon does all the framebuffer, kgi has the loadable pc
> style drivers and some work on acceleration that is going to go somewhere
> good whatever shape it ends up in. The combination of the lot once figured
> will be real nice for everyone
> Alan

Can best parts of KGI and fbcon be merged? How much work would that
propose to both sides?


Andrej Presern,

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:42    [W:0.140 / U:0.996 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site