[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Swap area: why not more than 128M each?
On Fri, Mar 13, 1998 at 07:19:36PM +0100, wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 1998 at 10:35:38AM +0000, wrote:
> > Not to sound like a dork, but why edo you need a gig of swap? just curious
> > :)
> Imagine, there are machines with RAM in the two digit gigabytes and they're
> swapping ...

Not that I'm against large swapfiles or anything, but with 1GB+ of
memory, putting 4GB of swap on one disk is not a good idea. On those
systems you need to spread the swap on lots of disks to get reasonable


Alexander Kjeldaas, Guardian Networks AS, Trondheim, Norway

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.063 / U:9.340 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site