Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Avoiding SMP | From | Zlatko Calusic <> | Date | 13 Mar 1998 17:18:03 +0100 |
| |
Chris Wedgwood <cw@ix.net.nz> writes:
> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 06:41:47 -0600 (CST) > From: Thomas Molina <tmolina@probe.net> > To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu > Subject: Re: Avoiding SMP > In-Reply-To: <199803100812.VAA10787@caffeine.ix.net.nz> > Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980310063758.5006B-100000@wr5z> > > Why is the SMP line uncommented by default anyway? If most people are > building UP kernels, the default should be UP IMHO. > > Because His Holiness uses SMP? > >
Probably because 2.1.x is development tree, and we want a stable SMP before stable tree (2.2.x).
To make it stable, we must test it thoroughly, do we?
And that comment about His Holiness is probably correct too. :)
Reagrds, -- Posted by Zlatko Calusic E-mail: <Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Took an hour to bury the cat. Silly thing kept moving.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |