[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Swap area: why not more than 128M each?
Followup to:  <>
By author: Alexander Kjeldaas <>
In newsgroup:
> Not that I'm against large swapfiles or anything, but with 1GB+ of
> memory, putting 4GB of swap on one disk is not a good idea. On those
> systems you need to spread the swap on lots of disks to get reasonable
> swap-bandwidth/memory.

Depends on what you're doing. Some people use swap mostly for
"parking" processes in T state, as can happen if you're using LSF (a
commercial load-distribution system), for example. It can eat up a
*lot* of swap in no time.

PGP: 2047/2A960705 BA 03 D3 2C 14 A8 A8 BD 1E DF FE 69 EE 35 BD 74
See for web page and full PGP public key
I am Bahá'í -- ask me about it or see
"To love another person is to see the face of God." -- Les Misérables

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.051 / U:0.720 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site