lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.1.89 broken?
    On 10 Mar 1998, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:

    >That is my experience as well... I've got 80 MB. It was happy with
    >about 56 MB for caches, 4 MB free and a little less than 20 MB

    I' ll happy with 0Mbyte free ;-).

    >used. Oh - and 75 MB used swap.

    I noticed that a recursive diff on a kernel tree loads very high 2.1.89,
    but I don' t remeber well how does it load other kernels version. I
    noticed that the system started to stall also in console. Sometimes the
    character was printed after a while on the console.

    Andrea[s] Arcangeli


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:3.552 / U:0.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site