Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 Mar 1998 14:12:06 -0800 | From | "David S. Miller" <> | Subject | Re: mmap() versus read() |
| |
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 22:30:33 +0100 (CET) From: MOLNAR Ingo <mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu>
On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Perry Harrington wrote:
> I think everyone will > agree that the current clone() method of creating threads is costly > at best. [...]
uhm, ~20 usecs on a 200 MHz PPro, is that 'costly at best'?
And it was just under 29,000 instructions on the Ultra last time I measured it with a cycle counter from userspace...
Later, David S. Miller davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
| |