[lkml]   [1998]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux 2.0.3x & gcc 2.8

On Wed, 4 Feb 1998, Philip Blundell wrote:

> >No, you have to convince Alan Cox, that it should. Seems he doesn't like
> >to fix anything for gcc-280.
> If you can get people to run kernels with gcc 2.8.0 and this patch for a few
> weeks and convince everyone that nothing breaks, it can probably go into
> 2.0.34. Putting it in otherwise is implicitly saying "gcc 2.8.0 is ok", and
> that's a dangerous thing to do.

gcc-2.8.0 will break at least 3 network drivers. I've already published
patches for it. But given the large (about 3) number of people who are
using them, I would not go for inclusion right now. I've only got success
reports, though ;)

And the same problem which is hidden by gcc-2.7 (bad or insufficiently
tight constraints in asm statements) might pop up in other places. I did
indeed perform a search and found a few places where it could bite,
depending on compiler options like optimization level, CPU type...


 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.071 / U:9.968 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site