lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Clue on 2.0.33 crashes
    Hi,

    On Fri, 20 Feb 1998, Doug Ledford wrote:

    > Jos Vos wrote:
    > >
    > > Thomas Schenk wrote:
    > >
    > > > And I would add that we have found that prior to every freeze that our
    > > > systems have experienced under 2.0.33, we find a syslog message from xntpd
    > > > as follows:
    > > >
    > > > Feb 11 09:18:46 acme xntpd[151]: kernel pll status change 89
    > > >
    > > > These messages do not occur immediately prior to the crash, but we have
    > > > theorized that this status change is a precursor to the lockup and the
    > > > number of lockups that we have seen has been greatly reduced since we
    > > > stopped using xntpd and started using ntpdate with the -b option in a
    > > > cron job to sync the clocks.
    >
    > Hmmmm, I'm running xntpd on about 5 systems and I've never had a lock nor
    > seen this message. Of course, that could be merely luck. The real question
    > in my mind is what is that message all about. There were significant
    > updates to the kernel time code in 2.0.32 or 2.0.33 (can't remember which).
    > It seems (by memory) that the changes were written by either Ulrich
    > {Wendel,Drepper} (SP?). Maybe the author would comment?

    We're running xntpd on all of our machines. IIRC Ulrich Windl is not
    subscribed to the kernel list.

    > Doug Ledford <dledford@dialnet.net>

    Hubert


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.020 / U:59.840 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site