lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Dec]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: ARRGHH !!! Gated is broken again in 2.1.131 ...

    Hello 'Sir' Alexey ,

    On Fri, 25 Dec 1998 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
    > Hello!
    > > #ifdef NOBSDSTRUCT < Is this section as it s/b ?
    > > #include <bsd/netinet/ip.h> < I would have thought the
    > > #else < opposite .
    > > #include <netinet/ip.h> < Under Slackware-3.6 or RH-5.2
    > > #endif < the bsd/netinet/* doesn't exist.
    >
    > NOBSDSTRUCT should not be defined in your case.
    > It means, that netinet/ip.h contains NO BSD STRUCTs 8)
    > It is evaluated in Makefile, based on presence of bsd/bsd.h

    > Is it true that the latest libc5 versions have bsd/bsd.h and have
    > no bsd/netinet/? I daresay H.J.Lu made some really stupid
    > things before stopping work on libc5 :-(
    Not sure if latest libc5 does not have 'bsd/netinet/?' .
    Slackware-3.6(Full install) has a 'bsd/?' but no 'bsd/netinet/?' .
    RedHat-5.2(Full install) has -NO- bsd directory anywhere .
    I don't have any other distro's. to be able to check against .

    > > - much later -
    > > Ouch, I have a funny feeling that something is -very-
    > > differant between your filesystem & mine .
    >
    > Yes 8)8) I use three installations now: sparc/glibc-2.0.7,
    > alpha/glibc-1.99 and intel/libc5. But all they are "customized" 8)
    > Customization for glibc-2.0.7 may be found in
    > ftp.inr.ac.ru/ip-routing/.glibc/, my libc5 is pretty old (5.3.8) and
    > it still has "perfect" BSD emulation mode.
    Wow , You have been busy , keeping track of all those differant
    libc packages 8-) . How many differant systems do you admin. ?

    > +#ifndef NBBY
    > +#include <bsd/bsd.h>
    > +#endif
    >
    > OK, it is great idea! I'll test whether it works with another
    > installations.
    This was submitted by Mr. Jon Lewis , Please credit him . :-)
    Yes after I looked at it I was very happy to have this fix
    in the tree I have been hacking on .

    > About NO_ANK_FIX:
    >
    > It is not supposed to work with NO_ANK_FIX certainly 8)8)
    > It is not an option, but just marker of a change, which I use
    > as reminder.
    OK, I'll keep my fingers off of it ;;-)

    > Alexey Kuznetsov Tia, JimL
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | James W. Laferriere - Network Engineer - babydr@baby-dragons.com |
    | System Techniques - 25416 - 22nd S. - Des-Moines, WA 98198 |
    | Give me VMS -or- Give me Linux -but- only on AXP |
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:3.568 / U:0.068 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site