Messages in this thread | | | From | (Alan Cox) | Subject | Re: <fcntl.h> vs <asm/fcntl.h> - total mess. | Date | Wed, 23 Dec 1998 21:33:04 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
> While they do it, it would be real nice if they fixed the umount() > definition that now takes 2 parameters instead of the 1 that glibc > shows.
That would be bad. It would break backward compatibility. umount() calls the old umount call, and in time will call the new one with 0 as the 2nd argument thus avoiding breaking binaries. umount2() will appear as the new interface
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |