Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Dec 1998 17:09:45 +0100 (CET) | From | MOLNAR Ingo <> | Subject | Re: pre-2.1.132-2.. |
| |
On Fri, 18 Dec 1998, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Since we just waste 64*4 byte in the struct, we could waste 16 more bytes > to be completly aligned I think...
this we'd have to make it a runtime pointer. Even if we could fix it up compile-time, the .section solution i suggested is better because we will not waste 'partial buffers', we will tightly pack cache-aligned structures into a continuous chunk.
-- mingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |