Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Dec 1998 11:42:06 +0000 (GMT) | From | Tigran Aivazian <> | Subject | Re: 2.1.131: some quality thoughts |
| |
On Thu, 17 Dec 1998, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> (I'm not subscribed here) > > Hello, > > after upgrading my home system significantly, I was able to work on > the 2.1.131 tree. Using CVS I have a few problems: > > /usr/src/linux/net/core is ignored by CVS standards. Shipping a > ".cvsignore" in the kernel tree is not an optimal sulution, because > the logic is inverted, and there's no ".cvsinclude" per concept. > > I know that it's ugly, but could "core" be renamed before 2.2 comes > out? Possible candidated might be "netcore", "kern[el]", "nucleus", > "base". A symbolic link could be added to tar archives to support the > old name if necessary.
Amongst other possibilities (listed as synonims by dict(1)) are:
substance, center, essence, gist, heart, inwardness, marrow, meat, nub, pith, sum, nitty-gritty.
I think "pith" and "nitty-gritty" are the best candidates :)
Regards, Tigran.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |