lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: clock too slow (6 times !) in kernel 2.0.36+ (Xeon450/permedia2)
From
Date
"Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com> writes:

> On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > the machine has a Permedia 2 AGP video card, that gets set to IRQ10 by
> > > the BIOS.
> > > The kernel clock runs fine, until I start X (XFree86-3DLabs-3.3.3). After
> > > that, the clock runs about six times too slow.
> > > So it takes about 6 seconds before there have been 100 timer interrupts.
> >
> > You need to report Xserver problems to the XFree project. They run the
> > server in user space highly priviledged so it is capable of screwing up
> > things like the clock.
>
> IRQ10 should mean nothing. The clock runs on IRQ0. However, with my
> new buggy-bios "thunder" motherboard, I found that moving an offending
> card to the slot furtherest away from the CPU "fixes" things.
>
> His screen card is not movable (AGP connector), however something
> else might be.
>
> So much for plug-and-play.

It is a software problem, and a fixed one, too.

I have already (in private e-mail) pointed the original poster to an X
server (the one from SUSE) that does not have this problem. The
XFree86 server is fixed now, but they have not yet put new binaries
up.

End of thread?

--
Regards, Anders
(address is valid)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.036 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site