lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: NO ROM BASIC
On Fri, 4 Dec 1998, Gerhard Mack wrote:

> Actually that error means it can'y find a bootable device.
> It dates mack to the early XT. Perhapse the boot block got corrupted...
>
> The early XTS would looks for basic in rom if they couldn't find a
> bootable device, if none then that error came up. some of the bios
> maufacturers still keep that message for some unknown reason.

I have an original 1981 IBM PC which has the ROM Basic. It was removed
(along with the tape interface) in the later IBM XT model. IIRC the XT
also had twin 360k floppy drives instead if a single drive.

--
Alistair Riddell - BOFH
IT Support Department, George Watson's College, Edinburgh
Tel: +44 131 447 7931 Ext 176 Fax: +44 131 452 8594
Microsoft - because god hates us


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans