Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Linux threads -- as seen in NT Magazine | Date | Thu, 10 Dec 1998 14:45:50 -0500 | From | Paul Barton-Davis <> |
| |
I wrote:
>However, I don't think that dealing only with tasks is very elegant. I >think it is a hangover from the pre-clone(2) days. It works well right >now because there are very few (any ?) multithreaded applications that >want to use MP hardware creatively. So, I think there is a very >elegant mechanism (clone(2)) that can be very elegantly used because ^^^^^^^ >of schedule().
Duh. Make that:
So, I think there is a very elegant mechanism (clone(2)) that *CANNOT* be very elegantly used because of schedule().
--p
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |