[lkml]   [1998]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: /proc/pci, lspci etc.

    > Yes, but it is like saying that we don't need route or netstat -rn because there
    > is /proc/net/route. The /proc/bus/pci/devices is good only if you know all ids
    > by heart.

    If we compare the situation to what we have with routing, we now get exactly
    the same -- for routes you have /proc/net/route and the `route' command to
    display it in human-readable format, for PCI you have /proc/bus/pci/devices
    and lspci.

    It's _really_ not sane to store table of all existing PCI devices in the
    kernel along with their names. The era of just a few PCI devices where
    /proc/pci was a possibility (although not a good one) is gone...

    Have a nice fortnight
    Martin `MJ' Mares <>
    Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
    "IBM = International Band of Magicians"

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.029 / U:24.468 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site