Messages in this thread | | | From | yodaiken@chelm ... | Subject | Re: Schedule idle | Date | Mon, 9 Nov 1998 06:51:24 -0700 (MST) |
| |
> > On Nov 08, yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu wrote: > > > Spell out what "important RT" means precisely and you will be in a position > > to make your code work. If you want a completely preemptable kernel, you > > have your work cut out for you. God alone knows what it means for a > > high priority RT task to "use the FS". > > my original feature request (which was solved for us by Ingo's SCHED_IDLE) > was to run background jobs (esp. `rc5' that time) which shall _not_ > (or only very minimally) compete with other running tasks, even with > nive-19 tasks (because we're using NQS/LSF style batch jobs which are
Why can't you run those tasks at nice 18?
> -- > All SCSI disks will from now on ___ _____ > be required to send an email notice 0--,| /OOOOOOO\ > 24 hours prior to complete hardware failure! <_/ / /OOOOOOOOOOO\
Inspiring policy.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |