lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Schedule idle
Date
> 
> On Nov 08, yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu wrote:
>
> > Spell out what "important RT" means precisely and you will be in a position
> > to make your code work. If you want a completely preemptable kernel, you
> > have your work cut out for you. God alone knows what it means for a
> > high priority RT task to "use the FS".
>
> my original feature request (which was solved for us by Ingo's SCHED_IDLE)
> was to run background jobs (esp. `rc5' that time) which shall _not_
> (or only very minimally) compete with other running tasks, even with
> nive-19 tasks (because we're using NQS/LSF style batch jobs which are

Why can't you run those tasks at nice 18?

> --
> All SCSI disks will from now on ___ _____
> be required to send an email notice 0--,| /OOOOOOO\
> 24 hours prior to complete hardware failure! <_/ / /OOOOOOOOOOO\

Inspiring policy.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.114 / U:0.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site