[lkml]   [1998]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: swapfile security weakeness
    > > swapon should keep a handle on the inode, which means the file won't
    > > be removed from the physical media even if it is unlinked (just like
    > > open files aren't.)
    > Unfortunately, there are a few issues with that:
    > - it doesn't work on inodeless FSes (msdosfs)
    > - you can't swapoff() a deleted file, leaving minor
    > fs corruption on reboot (and major corruption on
    > umsdos and the like)
    > - since you can't swapoff() the deleted file, you
    > can't reclaim the disk space
    > This basically means that we have a real problem at
    > hand that should be fixed.

    Sure it works on inodeless filesystems -- *ALL* filesystems are
    inode-based as far as the Linux kernel are concerned. However, your
    objection about swapoff() is well taken -- we need a variant that can
    take an index to a swap area rather than a filename.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.019 / U:8.136 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site