lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: /proc/pci, lspci etc.
On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> I saw people arguing about removing /proc/pci and would like to remind of
> one simple point why /proc/pci is a good thing. There is no doubt that
> lspci utility (part of the wonderful pciutils package by Martin Mares) is
> far superiour to anything else (i.e. /proc/pci and scanpci) for examining
> PCI configuration space. However, when you are installing a new system you
> do not usually have lspci available, but /proc/pci is always there.
>
> Yes, you can argue that Linux distributors should include it on their boot
> disks etc. but this being "taste-specific" will lead to nowhere, except
> plenty of headache for everyone.
>
> So, imho, although /proc/pci should be obsoleted by much better lspci this
> should not happen until one ensures that lspci can be used in *ALL*
> situations instead, including installation process itself.

Ever tried `cat /proc/bus/pci/devices'?

Greetings,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven Geert.Uytterhoeven@cs.kuleuven.ac.be
Wavelets, Linux/{m68k~Amiga,PPC~CHRP} http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~geert/
Department of Computer Science -- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven -- Belgium


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:1.256 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site