lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: why umsdos?
On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, Riley Williams wrote:

> That's why I suggested using VFAT as the underlying file system rather
> than MSDOS - it eliminates that routine completely since VFAT can
> already handle long filenames, so doesn't need it.

But VFAT can't store filenames differing only in case or containing some
strange characters, so some translation is needed anyway.

I would use UMSDOS-over-VFAT instead of pure VFAT if it was compatible
with VFAT. Then when I run out of space on Linux partitions, I could
quickly create a symlink to an umssynced directory on VFAT partition and
move something there, without breaking ownerships, symlinks etc.

--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * qrczak@knm.org.pl http://qrczak.home.ml.org/
\__/ GCS/M d- s+:-- a21 C+++>+++$ UL++>++++$ P+++ L++>++++$ E->++
^^ W++ N+++ o? K? w(---) O? M- V? PS-- PE++ Y? PGP->+ t
QRCZAK 5? X- R tv-- b+>++ DI D- G+ e>++++ h! r--%>++ y-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.088 / U:0.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site