lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: swapfile security weakeness
    Hi,

    On Thu, 5 Nov 1998 20:39:18 +0100 (CET), Jakub Vlasek <www@pilsedu.cz>
    said:

    > i've found that active swapfile could be deleted, which is
    > IMHO very dangerous (set immutable flag on in sys_swapon call?). Also,
    > sys_swapon should check whether owner of swapfile is root and is readable
    > only to root ( memory readableby anyone? hmm...)

    2.0 or 2.1? I've just tried on 2.1.127 and it is working fine: the file
    is unlinked but not deleted and the filesystem space remains reserved.

    On Fri, 6 Nov 1998 08:40:01 +0100 (CET), Rik van Riel
    <H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl> said:

    > Unfortunately, there are a few issues with that:
    > - it doesn't work on inodeless FSes (msdosfs)

    Not true. All filesystems have inodes.

    > - you can't swapoff() a deleted file, leaving minor
    > fs corruption on reboot (and major corruption on
    > umsdos and the like)

    That's no different to the normal case of rebooting with a file still
    open. At least on ext2, the filesystem will automatically be re-fscked
    on boot.

    > - since you can't swapoff() the deleted file, you
    > can't reclaim the disk space

    The fsck will fix things up.

    --Stephen

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.022 / U:2.252 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site