lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: arca-1-against-pre-2.1.127-3
On Mon, 2 Nov 1998, Gerard Roudier wrote:

>Even if not stated so, I think the 'next' field shall be considered as
>part of timer implementation not available to applications. We may call

Also using timer->expires directly would not be a good high level c++
implementation. Gerard, do a c++ port of the linux kernel and I' ll agree
with you. Right now my patch fix a _real_ C bug in C. I can agree that it
would be better to use a bit more high level function (as I' ll do now and
thanks for the suggestion) but I am very more worried to fix a real bug in
a obvious simple and __safe__ way.

Andrea Arcangeli


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.079 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site