[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] NIPQUAD macro broken on big endian

    On 7 Oct 1998, Andreas Schwab wrote:
    > My point is to make it work, nothing more and nothing less. Of course, it
    > doesn't *have* to be slow on little endian if the ntohl macro is properly
    > written so that gcc can combine the shifts inside and outside of it.

    - it's not so much slowness as code expansion (NIPQUAD is only used by
    various printk's, so performance per se is secondary)
    - a well-written htonl() macro will not do just the stupid expansion of
    shifts, it will use inline assembly to generate a "bswap" instruction.
    - gcc isn't that clever.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.018 / U:0.576 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site